MORE ON THE TREACHERY OF NOAM CHOMSKY(article 34)
by Benjamin Merhav
Noam Chomsky's replies to questions by The Independent readers are the same predictable replies this wealthy zionist, and dishonest bourgeois intellectual had provided on previous occasions over the years. Masquerading as the guru of the Left for many years now, and with his repeated pretences and cover-ups, Chomsky just becomes too boring to read. However, the following replies by him ,although still boring repetitions, provide the proximity of his zionist loyalty to his support for USA imperialism, proximity some of his devotees have failed to see so far. Even anti-imperialist leaders in Latin America and elsewhere have ignored it at their own peril.
Here are the relevant questions and Chomsky's revealing answers :
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14727.htm
"Do you believe Israel should exist, why and in what form ? NICK HARRIS
Chomsky : As a Zionist youth leader in the 1940s, I was among those who called for a binational state in Mandatory Palestine. When a Jewish state was declared, I felt that it should have the rights of other states - no more, no less.
Why should the US exist, sitting on half of Mexico, including Florida, conquered in a violent racist war carried out in violation of the Constitution?
And we can ask much the same about other states. State formation has been a brutal project, with many hideous consequences. But the results exist, and their pernicious aspects should be overcome.
Would you describe the US as it is now as a fascist state? T SUMMERS, CORNWALL
Chomsky : Far from it. In many respects it is the most free country in the world.
Surely the US, UK and Israel are guilty of war crimes? BALALL MAQBOOL
Chomsky : In the case of Lebanon, there is little doubt. Ample reasons have been given by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, and that's a bare beginning. But guilt extends far beyond. The Bush-Blair invasion of Iraq, for example, is a clear example of what the Nuremberg Tribunal determined to be "the supreme international crime", which encompasses all the evil that follows. We would do well to recall the eloquent words of Nuremberg chief counsel Justice Robert Jackson: "We are handing the defendants a 'poisoned chalice', and if we sip from it, we must accept the same judgement." The conclusions seem clear enough."
Let us see what is the meaning of those games of words behind which Noam Chomsky - the real zionist and pro-imperialist Noam Chomsky - is attempting to hide.
Firstly, about his early zionist past.
Yes, he was a zionist leader, of Hashomer Hatzair, the so called "zionist left". As such he , like Hashomer Hatzair at the time, supported a bi-national state in Palestine before 1948, when Palestine was Arab Palestine, and the zionist settler society was a minority there, and with most of the land settled and owned by the Arab people of Palestine. However, with the establishment of the zionist apartheid regime of Israel in 1948, an all out zionist war of ethnic cleansing began to drive the Palestinians out of their homeland. Hashomer Hatzair joined the first zionist government and participated enthusiastically in the ethnic cleansing of the Arabs of Palestine. Guru Noam Chomsky continued his active support for both Hashomer Hatzair and for the newly formed zionist apartheid regime of Israel, and now he tries to justify it by comparing the history of the expansionist zionist state with the history of the expansionist USA.
Please keep in mind that Noam Chomsky has continued his support for zionism and for the zionist apartheid regime of Israel all his life. At no stage did he oppose zionism or the zionist apartheid regime of Israel. He does not consider zionism as racism, much less as fascism.He does not consider the zionist state as a racist state, and he is opposed to sanctions against it.
Can racism,imperialism and fascism in the USA justify the criminal zionist apartheid regime of Israel ? Of course not ! Knowing too that the criminal zionist apartheid regime of Israel is responsible for the 4 million Palestinian refugees problem, and that it still continues with its policies of ethnic cleansing in Palestine. Noam Chomsky supports the zionist refusal to let the Palestinians return to their homeland ! How can anyone regard him as a left oriented and anti-imperialist intellectual under such circumstances ? How can anyone trust such a dishonest person ?
Secondly, now, regarding his support for USA imperialism.Let's read the question and answer again : " Would you describe the US as it is now as a fascist state?
Chomsky : Far from it. In many respects it is the most free country in the world." Did Hugo Chavez hear that the USA "is the most free country in the world" from Noam Chomsky? No,he could not get it from Chomsky, because it is not written in any of Chomsky's books or in any of his articles! However , other American writers do consider the USA as a fascist state ,already now ! Here are two examples : "How the USA became a Fascist State" by Chris Herz, http://narcosphere.narconews.com/story/2005/1/22/114858/087 ; and "14 points of fascism under george bush in the united states wake up and smell the fascism", a collection of news articles on http://oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm .
The USA is a plutocracy, i.e. a country ruled and controlled by big business. Fascism is the terrorist dictatorship of finance capital. Therefore, in the USA it remains in the hands of big business to decide when to exercise full scale terrorist dictatorship there, and they are likely to do that in times of crisis. Hence the complacency of most Americans, because there is no crisis at present. However, for Chomsky to state that the USA "is the most free country in the world" is more than support for the USA ruling class, it is tantamount to declaring his support for fascism there too !
Which brings us to the third question and answer as follows :
"Surely the US, UK and Israel are guilty of war crimes?
Chomsky : In the case of Lebanon, there is little doubt. Ample reasons have been given by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, and that's a bare beginning. But guilt extends far beyond. The Bush-Blair invasion of Iraq, for example, is a clear example of what the Nuremberg Tribunal determined to be "the supreme international crime", which encompasses all the evil that follows. We would do well to recall the eloquent words of Nuremberg chief counsel Justice Robert Jackson: "We are handing the defendants a 'poisoned chalice', and if we sip from it, we must accept the same judgement." The conclusions seem clear enough."
The question which begs itself is why, then, did Noam Chomsky fail to protest those horrendous war crimes and crimes against humanity in Palestine, in Lebanon, in Iraq ? Why did he not call for an international tribunal where top zionist and USA war criminals would be brought to justice and be punished ? Why did he not call for international sanctions to be imposed on the zionist apartheid regime of Israel ? Yet to me these are mere rhetorical questions, because the truth is that Noam Chomsky is a loyal zionist ,a dishonest bourgeois intellectual, and an ally of the USA rulers.
by Benjamin Merhav
Noam Chomsky's replies to questions by The Independent readers are the same predictable replies this wealthy zionist, and dishonest bourgeois intellectual had provided on previous occasions over the years. Masquerading as the guru of the Left for many years now, and with his repeated pretences and cover-ups, Chomsky just becomes too boring to read. However, the following replies by him ,although still boring repetitions, provide the proximity of his zionist loyalty to his support for USA imperialism, proximity some of his devotees have failed to see so far. Even anti-imperialist leaders in Latin America and elsewhere have ignored it at their own peril.
Here are the relevant questions and Chomsky's revealing answers :
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14727.htm
"Do you believe Israel should exist, why and in what form ? NICK HARRIS
Chomsky : As a Zionist youth leader in the 1940s, I was among those who called for a binational state in Mandatory Palestine. When a Jewish state was declared, I felt that it should have the rights of other states - no more, no less.
Why should the US exist, sitting on half of Mexico, including Florida, conquered in a violent racist war carried out in violation of the Constitution?
And we can ask much the same about other states. State formation has been a brutal project, with many hideous consequences. But the results exist, and their pernicious aspects should be overcome.
Would you describe the US as it is now as a fascist state? T SUMMERS, CORNWALL
Chomsky : Far from it. In many respects it is the most free country in the world.
Surely the US, UK and Israel are guilty of war crimes? BALALL MAQBOOL
Chomsky : In the case of Lebanon, there is little doubt. Ample reasons have been given by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, and that's a bare beginning. But guilt extends far beyond. The Bush-Blair invasion of Iraq, for example, is a clear example of what the Nuremberg Tribunal determined to be "the supreme international crime", which encompasses all the evil that follows. We would do well to recall the eloquent words of Nuremberg chief counsel Justice Robert Jackson: "We are handing the defendants a 'poisoned chalice', and if we sip from it, we must accept the same judgement." The conclusions seem clear enough."
Let us see what is the meaning of those games of words behind which Noam Chomsky - the real zionist and pro-imperialist Noam Chomsky - is attempting to hide.
Firstly, about his early zionist past.
Yes, he was a zionist leader, of Hashomer Hatzair, the so called "zionist left". As such he , like Hashomer Hatzair at the time, supported a bi-national state in Palestine before 1948, when Palestine was Arab Palestine, and the zionist settler society was a minority there, and with most of the land settled and owned by the Arab people of Palestine. However, with the establishment of the zionist apartheid regime of Israel in 1948, an all out zionist war of ethnic cleansing began to drive the Palestinians out of their homeland. Hashomer Hatzair joined the first zionist government and participated enthusiastically in the ethnic cleansing of the Arabs of Palestine. Guru Noam Chomsky continued his active support for both Hashomer Hatzair and for the newly formed zionist apartheid regime of Israel, and now he tries to justify it by comparing the history of the expansionist zionist state with the history of the expansionist USA.
Please keep in mind that Noam Chomsky has continued his support for zionism and for the zionist apartheid regime of Israel all his life. At no stage did he oppose zionism or the zionist apartheid regime of Israel. He does not consider zionism as racism, much less as fascism.He does not consider the zionist state as a racist state, and he is opposed to sanctions against it.
Can racism,imperialism and fascism in the USA justify the criminal zionist apartheid regime of Israel ? Of course not ! Knowing too that the criminal zionist apartheid regime of Israel is responsible for the 4 million Palestinian refugees problem, and that it still continues with its policies of ethnic cleansing in Palestine. Noam Chomsky supports the zionist refusal to let the Palestinians return to their homeland ! How can anyone regard him as a left oriented and anti-imperialist intellectual under such circumstances ? How can anyone trust such a dishonest person ?
Secondly, now, regarding his support for USA imperialism.Let's read the question and answer again : " Would you describe the US as it is now as a fascist state?
Chomsky : Far from it. In many respects it is the most free country in the world." Did Hugo Chavez hear that the USA "is the most free country in the world" from Noam Chomsky? No,he could not get it from Chomsky, because it is not written in any of Chomsky's books or in any of his articles! However , other American writers do consider the USA as a fascist state ,already now ! Here are two examples : "How the USA became a Fascist State" by Chris Herz, http://narcosphere.narconews.com/story/2005/1/22/114858/087 ; and "14 points of fascism under george bush in the united states wake up and smell the fascism", a collection of news articles on http://oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm .
The USA is a plutocracy, i.e. a country ruled and controlled by big business. Fascism is the terrorist dictatorship of finance capital. Therefore, in the USA it remains in the hands of big business to decide when to exercise full scale terrorist dictatorship there, and they are likely to do that in times of crisis. Hence the complacency of most Americans, because there is no crisis at present. However, for Chomsky to state that the USA "is the most free country in the world" is more than support for the USA ruling class, it is tantamount to declaring his support for fascism there too !
Which brings us to the third question and answer as follows :
"Surely the US, UK and Israel are guilty of war crimes?
Chomsky : In the case of Lebanon, there is little doubt. Ample reasons have been given by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, and that's a bare beginning. But guilt extends far beyond. The Bush-Blair invasion of Iraq, for example, is a clear example of what the Nuremberg Tribunal determined to be "the supreme international crime", which encompasses all the evil that follows. We would do well to recall the eloquent words of Nuremberg chief counsel Justice Robert Jackson: "We are handing the defendants a 'poisoned chalice', and if we sip from it, we must accept the same judgement." The conclusions seem clear enough."
The question which begs itself is why, then, did Noam Chomsky fail to protest those horrendous war crimes and crimes against humanity in Palestine, in Lebanon, in Iraq ? Why did he not call for an international tribunal where top zionist and USA war criminals would be brought to justice and be punished ? Why did he not call for international sanctions to be imposed on the zionist apartheid regime of Israel ? Yet to me these are mere rhetorical questions, because the truth is that Noam Chomsky is a loyal zionist ,a dishonest bourgeois intellectual, and an ally of the USA rulers.
posted by Justice Lover at 8:43 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home